What was the decision in the Supreme Court case of Gittlemacker v prasse?
In Gittlemacker v. Prasse, 428 F. 2d 1, 4-5 (3rd Cir. 1970), the court held that there was an absence of evidence on record to establish that plaintiff’s free exercise of religion was burdened.
What is the issue in the case Procunier v Martinez?
In Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396 (1974), the Supreme Court established a protective standard of inmate First Amendment rights of free speech — a standard that the Court would reduce in later years to accommodate prison officials.
In which 1972 case did the Supreme Court hold that inmates given a reasonable opportunity to practice their religious group answer choices?
Prisoners’ General Religious Rights “sincerely held” and “religious in nature.” 1 Cruz v. Beto (1972) 405 U.S. 319, 322, and fn. 2 [92 S.
In what case did the Supreme Court say the Constitution does not mandate comfortable prisons?
It is true, [ FARMER v. BRENNAN, ___ U.S. ___ (1994) , 12] as petitioner points out, that Wilson cited with approval Court of Appeals decisions applying an objective test for deliberate indifference to claims based on prison officials’ failure to prevent inmate assaults. See 501 U.S., at 303 (citing Cortes-Quinones v.
Who won Turner v Safley?
Hudson Jr. In Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987), the Supreme Court determined that restrictions on inmates’ constitutional rights, including those of the First Amendment, were subject to a rational basis standard of review.
Do prisoners have a right to marry?
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Turner v. Safley, No. 85-1384. 4872 U.S. 78 (1987) ruled that prisoners have a right, under the U.S. Constitution, to marry.
What was the ultimate decision of the US Supreme Court in the case of Wolff v McDonnell?
6–3 decision for Wolff The Supreme Court held that while prisoners are not entitled to full due process protections, disciplinary proceedings must include written notice to the defendant of the charges, a written statement of evidence, and the opportunity for an inmate to call witnesses and present evidence.
What did the Court rule in Fulwood v Clemmer case?
Clemmer (1962), Cooper v. Pate (1964), and Cruz v. Beto(1972). In the Fulwood (1962) case the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that correctional officials must recognize the Muslim faith as a legitimate religion and not restrict those inmates who wish to hold services.
What is Pell v procunier?
In Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817 (1974), the Supreme Court upheld California prison restrictions on face-to-face interviews with inmates. Inmates and journalists had challenged the restrictions as a violation of the First Amendment right of freedom of the press.